A defined engagement to understand priority risks, review cloud, identity, and email controls, implement agreed hardening, and document a 90-day roadmap.
Business context, critical assets, risk scenarios, and required decisions, presented without unnecessary jargon.
Targeted review of cloud configuration, identity, administrative accounts, email, and sharing controls.
Implementation of the changes specifically agreed in scope, with validation and handoff to the IT team.
Responsibilities, decisions, priority policies, and follow-up needed to support alignment with applicable obligations.
Sequenced actions, owners, dependencies, and verification criteria for the work that follows.
Leadership review of decisions made, residual risks, and the available next-step options.
The engagement does not stop at diagnosis: configuration and governance changes explicitly listed in the statement of work are implemented and verified with accountable stakeholders.
The roadmap covers the next 90 days. The delivery schedule is confirmed after scoping and depends on access, decision-maker availability, and IT-provider participation.
Final pricing varies with user and domain count, platforms, licences, observed gaps, and the amount of hardening included. The proposal confirms scope, exclusions, and schedule before work begins.
Findings, implemented changes, and items to monitor.
Agreed responsibilities, decisions, and documents.
Sequenced work with owners and verification criteria.
Ongoing control maintenance and governance under a confirmed scope.
Selected automation with rules, access controls, and human review.
Document structure, sharing, and access after the security baseline.
Leadership cadence for risk, decisions, and investment.
No. It includes assessment and implementation of explicitly agreed changes. Remediation outside scope is placed on the roadmap.
Yes. Access, responsibilities, changes, and handoff are coordinated with the designated team or provider.
No. It improves a defined baseline and supports alignment, but no engagement can guarantee the absence of incidents or replace legal advice or certification.
Out-of-scope items are documented, prioritized, and separately priced before additional implementation.
The fit call clarifies the trigger, fit, and next step. It is not a substitute for an assessment.
